Wednesday, June 18, 2025

2001-04-23 The creation of Societies One Person’s Thoughts

 

If man creates Gods and religions, and each one vies for members and power, how can the men that are supposed to represent these supposed to keep their faith?  The business like actions of religions to adopt holidays and reasons for holidays from other religions cannot represent a faith.  The faith should provide the holidays.  It should provide the meanings.  It should not adapt it’s self to another if it is the true path. 

            The true path should have a discernible source.  It should be traceable.  It should be believable without trying to market it.  Faith is not a marketable item.  It is an item that is felt from within.

            From what I see, man has a need to have a God or Gods.  The reasons I feel are very basic.  People (groups) need something to make them feel that it all has a reason.  By it all, I mean what happens to a person during their life.  It would be like a security blanket.  It certainly feels like a very cold place if it all is for nothing, if it all is happenstance. 

            Perhaps the “faith” needs to be in what a person can do to leave a memory or effect a change that will transcend them after they have died, to leave something behind that satisfies a need of humans to be remembered.

            Religions do play a large role in getting people to get along.  They have some very sound advise about behavior and conduct.  Perhaps the learned men of the past knew that people as groups, do not or will not believe an idea that causes them to put aside their own needs to help another.  Nobles of the past were to provide food and shelter for their serfs.  Most of these noble families were started by wealthy or powerful people that claimed some rite to the lands.  They got this by force or money or both.  The religions (I believe) sought to gain favor by showing the nobles methods to get the serfs to work more productively.  Thus increasing the noble’s status by increasing wealth.  Since most people believe that the accumulation of items is the measure of status, this worked out well.

            In Egypt, the Pharaoh’s used the same forces to accomplish this.  Then secured it through the enacting of “Birth Rite”.  This enabled them to keep what they had achieved in their family.  The Greeks, Romans, Celts, Turks and all others that I have heard of, used that same tactics. 

            The difference came in what group they used to assist them to keep their power.  A combination of armies controlled by the government and the giving of power and favor to a religion (or in some cases, several religions) that gave them tools to wield.  By telling the populace that their rule is blessed by something larger than their abilities to obtain power, they bought time.  The next step was to get the army to restore or create order and make themselves the focus for decisions.  Then the religions sent their representatives to the people spreading the ideas that the ruling body was just because of a higher power than man was giving them rules that enabled them to live peaceably.  To use this set of conditions, the populace would gain security and a place in humanities history for remembrance.  That to not work within these conditions would mean that you did not fit in with humanity.  You did not deserve the protection of the government and populace.  You are on your own, alone.

            The change from plural to singular in these areas is the key in my opinion.  We get back to the pack mentality of the basic animals we derived from.  Man has never wanted to admit that were an evolved species, that we were what we are studying now.  Humans have their pride.  Humans have their needs.  Humans do not like to be alone.  Humans like to be favored.  Humans like to deflect communal focus in areas where they may be questionable in their conformity.  So they find others that either do not conform or are slightly different.  They focus other humans to this difference.  Since conformity is the social normal, non-conformity is anti-social.  Thus, the now anti-social or non-conformist element becomes the focus.  If the ruling body, religion, or army needs to pull the majority together, now they have their catalyst.  Hence, humans feed the need once again and perpetuate the circle.

            The main point of all this is, think about what drives you.  Why are you doing what you are doing?  Why would another person want your support?  If you think about the basic needs of every person, you will find the answer you seek.

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                Scott N. Smiley

                                                                                                April 23, 2001

No comments:

Post a Comment